2023-2024 School Year Income Verification Procedures

File Attachments: 

*Printer-friendly version of the full booklet in file attachments section below.

School Food Authorities (SFAs) participating in the School Breakfast Program (SBP) and/or National School Lunch Program (NSLP) that conduct standard counting and claiming procedures are required to select and verify a sample of their approved free and reduced-price meal applications on file as of October 1st by November 15th of each year. This process is called Income Verification.

This guidance manual contains important information on how to conduct Income Verification and includes template letters that should be used to correspond with families.

List of SFAs Required to Conduct Income Verification

SFAs that are required to conduct income verification will appear on the attached list which also includes an indicator of the allowable sampling methods for each SFA.

2023-2024 School Year Important Information

Income Verification Sample Size: The sample size used to conduct income verification activities must be based on the number of approved applications on file as of October 1, 2023.  For the 2023-2024 School Year, October 1 falls on a Sunday and therefore, SFAs should use the next operating day to establish their income verification sample pool. 

Verification Collection Report

All SFAs that conduct income verification must complete and submit the Verification Collection Report on the Child Nutrition Management System (CNMS) by December 15, 2023. SFAs operating the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) or operating Provision 2 SFA-wide are not required to complete the Verification Collection Report.

Additional Resources

USDA Eligibility Manual for School Meals

USDA Verification Tool Kit

Income Verification & Verification Collection Report Snip-It

If you have any questions regarding Income Verification, please contact your Child Nutrition Program representative at 418-473-8781 or email addresses can be found on our Contact Us page.

Attachments

It is recommended that Attachment A be sent to all households selected for verification. The other attachments are available to be used as needed.

Attachment A

Attachment A page 1 of 4- “Letter to Households- Notification of Selection for Verification of Eligibility”

Attachment A page 2 of 4- USDA Nondiscrimination Statement

Attachment A page 3 of 4- “Adult Household Members”

Attachment A page 4 of 4- “Verification Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals”

Attachment B

Attachment B page 1 of 2- “Letter to the SNAP/TANF/FDPIR Office from the SFA”

Attachment B page 2 of 2- “Verification Form- SNAP/TANF/FDPIR Office from the SFA”

Attachment C

Attachment C page 1 of 2- “Letter of Verification Results and Change in Eligibility”

Attachment C page 2 of 2- USDA Nondiscrimination Statement

Attachment D

Attachment D page 1 of 2- “Letter of Change in Eligibility for SNAP/TANF/FDPIR Households”

Attachment D page 2 of 2- USDA Nondiscrimination Statement

Attachment E

Attachment E- “Notification of Continuation of Benefits as a Result of Verification”

Attachment F

Attachment F- “Verification Summary/Recordkeeping”

Attachment G

Attachment G - “School Food Authority (SFA) Verification Collection Report”

See Verification Collection Report (Attachment G) for more information.

Verification Collection Report (Attachment G)

File Attachments: 

Note: Please be sure to carefully read the Verification Collection Report Instructions to ensure the report is completed accurately.

SFAs must report all data elements requested on the Verification Collection Report (Attachment G) in the Child Nutrition Management System (CNMS) by December 15th.

SED is required to analyze, summarize, and submit the results to USDA.

The required data will enable State agencies and USDA to better understand certification errors and to improve oversight activities.  This will help to ensure that free and reduced-price subsidized meals are provided only to eligible children. State agencies must provide more rigorous oversight activities to SFAs whose verification activities result in a high termination rate.

Failure to submit a completed Verification Collection Report by the required deadline, December 15, will result in your Child Nutrition Programs being placed on reimbursement hold.

Only USDA required elements are requested on the Verification Collection Report (Attachment G).  Be sure you review it carefully to capture the required information that documents your SFAs efforts.  Carefully follow the directions for completing the form. 

Requests to extend the November 15th verification deadline must be submitted in writing to your Child Nutrition Program Representative at the State Education Department. All such requests must document extenuating circumstances beyond the SFAs control and should be received by the Child Nutrition Program office by October 15th.

A step-by-step tutorial on how to complete the Verification Collection Report is posted on the Child Nutrition Knowledge Center website. SFAs are strongly encouraged to review the tutorial when completing their report.

Introduction

Federal regulations require that all School Food Authorities (SFAs) participating in the School Breakfast Program (SBP) and/or National School Lunch Program (NSLP) conducting standard counting and claiming procedures select and verify a sample of their approved free and reduced-price meal applications on file as of October 1st by November 15th of each year. This process is called Income Verification.

Income Verification is the confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced-price meals under the NSLP and SBP. Verification is only required when eligibility is determined through the application process, and is not required for eligibility determinations made through the direct certification process.

Verification must include either confirmation of income eligibility or confirmation that the child or any member of the household is receiving assistance under Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR) or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or that a child is Other Source Categorically Eligible. Verification may also include confirmation of any other information required on the application, such as household size.

Income Verification requirements have become more stringent in order to improve the fiscal integrity of the child nutrition programs and the verification process.  It is essential that verification efforts be completed on time, that changes in eligibility are implemented for all family members and that adequate records of your efforts are maintained. The selection of applications cannot target discrimination against anyone on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability.

Getting households to respond to verification requests can be challenging for SFA staff. If households do not respond, they lose their benefits regardless of their actual eligibility. In addition, the number of approved applications an SFA is required to verify is impacted by the number of responses they were able to obtain the previous year.

To assist SFAs with addressing these issues, USDA has developed a Verification Toolkit. The Toolkit contains a collection of resources that SFAs can use in their efforts to improve verification response rates and the overall efficiency of the process. These resources were developed by FNS but feature input from State and local officials from around the country. They were informed by two years of formal studies conducted by FNS and the Office of Evaluation Science’s Social & Behavioral Sciences Team, as well as through a public contest and from informal conversations with program operators. To view the Toolkit, please visit https://www.fns.usda.gov/school-meals/verification-toolkit.

SFAs must report the results of the income verification process by completing and submitting the Verification Collection Report on the Child Nutrition Management System (CNMS) by December 15th.

How To Conduct Verification

Start planning early!  Allow yourself enough time to complete the verification process by the required deadline.

Verification efforts are not required for:

  • Residential childcare institutions (RCCIs), with the exception of RCCIs with day students, where eligible students must complete an application
  • Schools in which all students are served without a separate charge for food services and the school claims only paid reimbursement
  • Schools that do not have any free or reduced-price eligible students
  • Schools participating in the Special Milk Program, even if they offer free milk
  • Schools in non-base years of Provision 2. They must, however, conduct the Direct Certification Matching Process (DCMP) and report SNAP and Medicaid Direct Certification eligibility annually.
  • Schools operating in the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). They must, however, conduct DCMP and report SNAP and Medicaid Direct Certification eligibility annually.
  • New SFAs who begin participation in a Child Nutrition Program after October 1 do not need to complete the verification process in their first year of operation only.

Establishing the Sample Pool

To establish the sample pool, SFAs must count the number of approved free and reduced applications on file for the entire SFA as of October 1. The sample pool depends on the number of approved applications, paper or electronic, and is not based on the number of children eligible for free and reduced priced benefits. If October 1 falls on a weekend or a school break, use the next operating day to establish the sample pool.

SFAs have the option to begin verification prior to October 1, once they begin the application approval process for the current school year. This option may ease the administrative burden for particularly large SFAs who receive several household income applications. However, the sample pool must still be based on the number of applications on file as of October 1. See the Beginning Verification Prior to October 1 tab for additional details.

Applications submitted for “mixed households,” which include children who are eligible based on income and others based on Other Source Categorical Eligibility, are subject to verification and must be included in the sample pool.

Applications with case numbers that are not certified through direct certification are subject to verification and should be included in the sample pool.

Verification must take place after an application has been approved.

Do NOT include:

  • Households that are matched through the Direct Certification Matching Process (DCMP) for SNAP/Medicaid, and those students who have been identified as living in the same household as the certified student receiving SNAP/Medicaid benefits
  • Certification letters for SNAP/TANF from the local assistance agencies
  • Foster children who are identified by a list or letters from social services and voluntary placement agencies
  • Migrant children who have been identified by the district's Migrant Education Program
  • Runaway or homeless children who have been identified by the district's McKinney-Vento school district liaison
  • Children participating in federally funded Head Start/Even Start

*When carrying over eligibility for the first 30 operating days for students whose free or reduced eligibility was determined in the previous school year, do not count these applications in your verification pool and do not verify eligibility. The carryover applications were subject to the verification process in the previous school year.

Beginning Verification Prior to October 1

The National School Lunch Act states that verification must be based on a school’s sample size as of October 1 each school year.  However, SFAs are now allowed to begin verification once they begin the application approval process for the current school year and have approved applications on file. This means SFAs are not required to wait until October 1 to initiate the verification process and may instead choose to begin conducting verification once they begin the application approval process for the current school year.

When beginning verification prior to October 1, SFAs must:

  • Decide how often to sample applications (weekly, every other week, etc.)
  • Include in each sample pool only applications approved since the last sample was selected
  • Select either 3 percent or 1.5 percent of approved applications, as required by the sampling method, each time. Round down to the nearest whole number to prevent over sampling

On or around October 1:

  • Sample the final set of applications, selecting only from the applications approved since the last sampling
  • Calculate the number of applications selected for verification to date (including the October sample)
  • Calculate 3% or 3,00 (or 1.5%, if applicable) of all applications approved as of October 1, rounding up to the next whole number
    • If the number of applications selected to date is less than 3%/1.5% number, fill the remainder of the sample by selecting randomly from error prone, categorically eligible, or all applications, approved since the beginning of the school year as required for the sampling method
    • If there are not enough applications of the required type, then sample randomly from all applications

Please note that all existing statutory and regulatory requirements continue to apply when using this approach, but the timing and sampling process is tailored to accommodate the extended timeframe during which verification is being conducted. 

Selecting Your Sample Size

Using the sample pool, SFAs will calculate the required sample size (number of applications that must be verified) using one of the following methods:

  • Error Prone (Standard) Sampling Method
  • Random Sampling Method (Alternate 1)
  • Focused Sampling Method (Alternate 2)

The Error Prone (Standard) Sampling Method must be used by an SFA unless it qualifies to use one of the alternate sampling methods. The SFAs approved to use an alternate sampling method are listed in the SFAs Required to Conduct Income Verification tab.

When determining the sample size, regardless of the verification method used, SFAs must always round up to the nearest whole number. For example, if your sample size is 3.18 you must verify 4 applications. You may not verify any more or any less than the required sample size allowed.  Please note, at least one application must always be verified.

Error Prone (Standard) Sampling Method

New SFAs and SFAs that had less than 80 percent response rate to verification in the prior school year MUST use the Error Prone (Standard) Sampling Method to conduct verification in the current school year. SFAs coming off Provision 2 or CEP must also use the error prone sampling method.

For Error Prone (Standard) Sampling Method, SFAs must verify the lesser of three percent (3%) or 3,000 of the approved applications on file as of October 1. The applications to be verified must be selected randomly from applications that meet the definition of an Error Prone application.

*Error prone applications are those with a reported income within $24 per week, $100 per month, or $1,200 per year of the applicable Income Eligibility Guidelines.

If the SFA does not have enough error prone applications to produce a three percent (3%) sample, the SFA must use income applications and/or applications that report a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR number selected at random to meet the required sample size under the error prone sampling method.

SNAP/TANF/FDPIR applications will not be selected unless there are too few applications that meet the error prone criteria.

Note: When approving applications, SFAs should flag those that meet the error prone definition (see definition above) in order to facilitate this process.

Alternate Sampling Methods (Random Method & Focused Method)

SFAs that had an 80 percent (80%) or greater response rate in the previous school year may choose to select an alternate option for verification. (Please see the list of schools with 80% or greater response rate based on the previous school year's Income Verification.) These schools may choose to use the Error Prone Sampling Method or may choose one of the following sampling methods:

Random Sampling Method (Alternate 1)

SFAs must verify the lesser of three percent (3%) or 3,000 of the total number of approved applications on file as of October 1. The applications to be verified must be selected randomly.  The random sample should include both income applications and categorically eligible applications for children receiving SNAP/TANF/FDPIR benefits whose names do not appear on the direct certification matching list.

Focused Sampling Method (Alternate 2)

SFAs must verify the lesser of one percent (1%) or 1,000 of the total number of approved applications selected from income applications nearest the income eligibility guidelines (error prone applications); PLUS the lesser of half percent (½ %) or 500 of approved applications which reported a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number on an application instead of income information.

Example:

The Focused Sampling Method could be accomplished as follows:

SFA with 900 approved applications which include 600 applications that reported a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number

1.  Count all approved applications, including applications reporting a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number to determine the number required to fill the one percent of income sample size

.01 (1%) x 900 = 9

2.  Separate applications into two groups:  

  • Income Applications (non-SNAP/TANF/FDPIR)
  • Applications reporting a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number

3.  From the income applications (non-SNAP/TANF/FDPIR) group, select the sample of households (9) from error prone applications. If you do not have enough error prone applications, select the remainder at random from the income applications.

4.  From the applications with a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number, determine the number required to fill the .5 percent sample size

.005 (.5 percent) x 600 = 3

5.  Choose the applications (3) from those that reported a SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number.

6.  Perform the confirmation review on all selected applications and continue with all steps of verification.

*Note: 12 applications were verified in this example (9 income and 3 SNAP/TANF/FDPIR)

Confirmation Review

Prior to conducting any verification activity, an individual other than the original reviewing official must review each approved application selected for verification to ensure that the initial determination was accurate. The confirmation review must be done by an individual other than the individual who made the initial eligibility determination. A confirmation review is not required if the SFA uses a technology-based system that demonstrates a high level of accuracy in processing an initial eligibility determination.  

If an SFA is using “eligibility determining” software, it is the SFA’s responsibility to ensure that the "eligibility determining" software conforms to USDA regulations.

Depending on the outcome of each confirmation review, the SFA must take one of the following actions:

No Change in Status
  • Verifies the application
Status Change From Reduced Price to Free
  • Make the increased benefits available immediately
  • Notify the Household of change in benefits
  • Verify the application
Status Change From Free to Reduced Price
  • Do not change the child’s status
  • Verify the application
  • Notify the household of the correct eligibility status after verification is completed and, if required, sends the household a notice of adverse action.
Status Change From Free or Reduced Price to Paid
  • Immediately send the household a notice of adverse action
  • Do not verify the application
  • Select a similar application (example- another error prone application) to verify
  • Begin the verification process with the newly selected application. The second reviewing official must review the application.

Replacing Applications

The SFA may, on a case-by-case basis, replace up to five percent (5%) of the applications selected for verification. Applications may be replaced when the SFA believes that the household would be unable to satisfactorily respond to the verification request.  The SFA must document why the application was replaced. Any application removed must be replaced with another approved application selected on the same basis (i.e., an error prone application must be substituted for a withdrawn error prone application). The newly selected application must then have a confirmation review prior to being verified. In those SFAs where five percent of total applications result in less than one, one application may still be replaced. All results of the five percent calculation are rounded up to the next whole number.

When an application is selected for verification and, prior to hearing back from the household in question, that household is found on a direct certification list, the application does not have to be replaced in the verification sample pool. The application would be marked as a direct certification in the appropriate box in Section 3 of the verification collection report. SFAs should include these applications in Field 5-5 (Number of applications selected for verification) of the verification collection report and indicate the number of these applications that are being converted to direct certification in the remarks portion of the verification collection report.

Notifying Households of Selection

When a household is selected for verification, the SFA must provide the household with a letter or an email if the parent or guardian contact information is known informing a household of its selection and must provide a list of the documents or other forms of evidence the household must submit to the SFA. When the SFA uses agency records or direct verification to confirm eligibility, a letter informing the household of its selection for verification is not required, as verification is completed. Please see the “Direct Verification” section of this booklet for more information on direct verification.

It is recommended that SFAs use the NYSED prototype “Letter to Households-Notification of Selection for Verification of Eligibility” letter (Attachment A) as this prototype letter contains all required information.

The notification letter must include:

  • An indication that the household was selected for verification
  • If a child is receiving benefits based on income, a list of the types of acceptable information that may be provided to confirm current income:
    • Pay stubs;
    • Award letters from assistance agencies for benefits such as Social Security or SSI; or
    • Support payment decrees from courts;
  • If a child is receiving benefits based on categorical eligibility, the household may provide proof that a child or any household member is receiving benefits under an Assistance Programs (SNAP/TANF/FDPIR) or that a child is Other Source Categorically Eligible instead of providing income information;
  • A warning that information must be provided by a date specified by the SFA and that failure to do so will result in termination of benefits
  • Notice that documentation of income or receipt of assistance may be provided from any point in time between the months prior to application and the time the household is required to provide income documentation
  • A modified Use of Information Statement as follows: 

The Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act requires the information requested in order to verify your children’s eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. If you do not provide the information or provide incomplete information, your children may no longer receive free or reduced-price meals

  • Name of an SFA official who can answer questions and provide assistance
  • A toll-free number for parents to obtain assistance. This can be a local number within the district.  It cannot be a long-distance call
  • The full USDA Nondiscrimination Statement.

Note:  You do not need to collect social security numbers of all adults in the household as part of the verification process. Ensure all notification letters are updated and do not request this information.

Any communications with households concerning verification must be in an understandable and uniform format and, to the maximum extent practicable, in a language that parents and guardians can understand.

Verification of Eligibility

All applications selected for verification must be resolved.  All families selected must provide information that verifies or confirms their eligibility, or the families must be notified formally in writing that their benefits will change.  Changes in eligibility must be updated at the point of service for all family members in the SFA.

Correctly approved applications are effective for the entire school year. If a family selected for verification submits information that confirms either their income or receipt of SNAP/TANF/FDPIR benefits for the time period beginning the month before they applied through the time the application is verified, the child's eligibility remains in effect. You may not change their status to reduced or paid if the family substantiates they were eligible for the free benefits when they applied.  This is true even if current income proves at the time of verification they are no longer eligible.

Written Evidence

Written evidence is the primary source of eligibility confirmation for all households, including TANF, FDPIR, Other Source Categorical Eligibility Programs, and foster child households. Written evidence most often includes pay stubs from employers or award letters from assistance agencies or other government agencies.

Acceptable Written Evidence

Income Eligible

Contains:

  • The name of the household member
  • Amount of income received
  • Frequency received
  • The date the income was received

*A pay stub with no dates would be insufficient

Categorically Eligible: Assistance Program

An official letter or notice indicating that the child or any household member is receiving benefits from that program, such as a notice of eligibility.

*A document from an Assistance Program that does not specify the certification period does not meet the documentation for verification.

*For example, the identification cards for SNAP or TANF would be insufficient unless it contains an expiration date.

Categorically Eligible: Other Source

An official letter, notice, or list from the appropriate State agency, social service agency, program office or coordinator, or court.

Note: Tax returns may be used to verify income of self-employed household members ONLY. 

When a Household Provides Pay Stubs

Households may provide pay stubs with income from employment. If a weekly pay stub is representative of what the household normally receives each week, one pay stub is sufficient.

If the household submits a pay stub that includes overtime, the determining official should work with the household to determine whether the overtime for the month being verified is representative of overtime received in other months. If the overtime is a one-time or sporadic source of income, income should be calculated based on the regular monthly income without overtime.

Indication of “No Income”

If a household is selected for verification, or the application is being verified for cause and the application indicates zero income, the SFA must request an explanation of how living expenses are met and may request additional written documentation or collateral contacts.  For example, the collateral contact may be asked to document the duration and type of assistance that is provided to the household.

Collateral Contacts

A collateral contact is a person outside of the household who is knowledgeable about the household’s circumstances and can give confirmation of a household’s income level or participation in Assistance Programs or Other Source Categorical Eligibility Programs. Collateral contacts include employers, social service agencies, migrant workers’ agencies, and religious or civic organizations. The verifying official should request a collateral contact only in cases when the household has not been able to provide adequate written evidence.

The verifying official must give the household the opportunity to designate the collateral contact. However, the verifying official may select a collateral contact if the household fails to designate one or designates one who is unacceptable to the verifying official. In either case, no contact may be made without first notifying the household and obtaining its permission. At the time of the notice, the household may consent to the contact or provide acceptable documentation in another form. If the household refuses to choose one of these options, the household’s eligibility will be terminated in accordance with normal verification procedures. Households which dispute the validity of information acquired through collateral contacts or a system of records must be given the opportunity to provide other documentation.

All collateral contacts may be written or oral and must be documented, dated, and initialed. The SFA will examine any written information provided by the collateral contact or evaluate any oral information. If the collateral contact is unwilling or unable to provide the requested information, the SFA must contact the household to complete the verification process.

Foster Children

If a household application is selected for verification in which a foster child is listed as a family member, and State or local documentation certifying the foster child for free meal benefits has been provided to the school, then only the family income or SNAP/TANF/FDPIR case number must be verified for the other students listed on the application.

If the family application is the only form of certification for the foster child, then documentation verifying the foster child’s status would be required.  Documentation from a State or local foster agency or the court where the foster child received placement is acceptable for verification.

SNAP/TANF/FDPIR

Verification consists of confirming current receipt of SNAP (only for children not found in the direct certification matching process), TANF or FDPIR benefits for each child/household listed. If at least one member of the household confirms receipt of SNAP/TANF/FDPIR, the remainder of the children residing in the household shall remain eligible through confirmation of school enrollment records. Verification of eligibility for households that provided an Assistance Program case number on the application may be accomplished by submitting a list of names and Assistance Program case numbers to the local SNAP or assistance office for confirmation of certification of receipt of benefits from agency records or by directly verifying eligibility using the Direct Certification Matching Process (DCMP) data. Please see the “Direct Verification” section for more information.

It is essential to cooperatively discuss and work out a mutually effective and efficient means for handling requests for verification of current SNAP/TANF participation by school officials and school meal applicants with local SNAP/TANF agencies. Refer to Attachment B for requesting verification from local SNAP/TANF agencies. Please note local SNAP/TANF agencies may not be able to provide this service. The SFA is encouraged to first utilize the DCMP data prior to conducting direct verification with local SNAP/TANF agencies.

Note: EBT cards cannot be used to confirm eligibility in SNAP or TANF.

Direct Verification

Direct verification is a method that can be used to confirm eligibility for verification. Direct verification uses records from public agencies to verify assistance program participation which can help reduce the burden upon families and eliminate non-responders. Results of Direct Verification must be reported on the School Food Authority Verification Collection Report.

SFAs are not required to conduct direct verification but are encouraged to utilize this method. Direct verification was put in the federal law to make it easier for eligible families to retain benefits and is an excellent means to address the non-response rates of households selected for verification. It is not an opportunity to run a computer check for all children in your school.  Direct verification should be used only to check students selected in your verification sample.

Direct verification must be conducted prior to contacting the household for documentation. Direct verification can be used for the sample selected for verification via the error prone method, the random sample, or the focused sample. SFAs must have security measures to ensure the confidentiality of the information.

SFAs will conduct the direct verification process by using the Direct Certification Matching Process (DCMP) data. Direct certification electronic records will provide data for the current school year through October and will be available to authorized users of the New York State Student Identification System (NYSSIS).

To directly verify students using the direct certification matching system SFAs must:

  • Have a username and password to access the SED Business Portal with entitlements to the NYSSIS system
  • Search the direct certification data by last name or date of birth for a specific student that was selected for verification
  • If the student is found on the list, the student is eligible for free meal benefits. Verification is considered complete and further documentation is not needed from the family to confirm eligibility.
  • If the student is not found on the direct certification list, you must continue verification efforts. You must notify the family that they have been selected for verification and request documentation to confirm eligibility.
  • Keep a record of directly verified students on file for 3 years plus the current year.

Verification of eligibility for households that provided an Assistance Program case number on the application may also be accomplished by submitting a list of names and Assistance Program case numbers to the local SNAP or assistance office for confirmation of certification of receipt of benefits from agency records. Please see Attachment B for the prototype letter that may be used.

If information provided by the public agency does not verify eligibility or if you are not able to find the student through the direct certification matching data, the SFA must proceed with regular verification activities. The SFA must complete direct verification immediately following the October 1 verification sample selection, so that households not directly verified can be contacted for verification information in a timely manner.

If information obtained through this process verifies that the household is participating in an assistance program no additional verification is required. The eligibility status of the child or children listed on the application is considered verified and a letter informing the household of its selection for verification is not required.

When an application is selected for verification and, prior to hearing back from the household in question, that household is found on a direct certification list, the application does not have to be replaced in the verification sample pool. The application would be marked as a direct certification in the appropriate box in Section 3 of the verification collection report. SFAs should include these applications in Field 5-5 (Number of applications selected for verification) of the verification collection report and indicate the number of these applications that are being converted to direct certification in the remarks portion of the verification collection report.

Verification Follow-Up

To continue the verification process subsequent to household notification, the SFA must either determine:

  • If the household has submitted adequate information to complete its individual verification activity; or
  • If follow-up with the household is needed.

Following Up with Households

SFAs must make at least one attempt to contact the household when the household does not adequately respond to the request for verification. The required follow up can be done in writing (letter or e-mail), or by telephone or text message. The SFA must document that contact was attempted and ensure the LEP households are provided adequate language assistance and understand the need to respond to the verification request.  Please see the “Non-Responders” section for steps to take if a family does not respond to verification.

The SFA must make a follow-up attempt when the household:

  • Does not respond to the initial request for verification
  • Submits insufficient or obsolete written evidence
  • Does not designate collateral contacts
  • Collateral contacts are unable or unwilling to provide the requested evidence

When following up with households, the SFA:

  • Must inform the household that failure to provide adequate written evidence or to designate an adequate collateral contact will result in termination of benefits
  • Must attempt to obtain the missing written evidence or collateral contact information
  • Must contact the household to complete the verification process, if the collateral contact is unwilling or unable to provide the requested information

SFAs are encouraged but not required to do additional follow-up attempts if a household fails to provide adequate documentation after the required follow-up. If the household does not respond or fails to provide adequate documentation after the required follow-up and, if applicable, additional follow-ups, verification is considered complete for the household when notice of adverse action is sent.

Results of Verification

If, after at least one follow-up attempt, the household responds and provides all needed evidence, verification is considered complete for this household.

 The SFA would complete verification by:

  • Informing the household that there is no change in benefits;
  • Notifying the household that its benefits will be increased; or
  • Sending notice of adverse action

It is recommended that SFAs use the NYSED prototype letters of verification results (Attachments C, D & E) as these prototype letters contain all required information.

  • If verification results in higher benefits (e.g., a child who is moved from reduced price to free category), the change is effective immediately and must be implemented no later than 3 operating days.
  • All households for whom benefits are to be reduced or terminated as a result of verification must be given 10 calendar days advance written notice of the change.

Note: If a family’s benefits are reduced as a result of verification (e.g., because they failed to respond or did not submit sufficient information to substantiate their income) and during the school year the family re-applies, the SFA must verify the new application prior to the family being approved for benefits.  If the family refuses to provide the required information, free or reduced-price benefits must be denied.

Non-Responders

Any household which fails to submit requested verification documentation by the date specified by the SFA or submits verification information which does not support the initial determination of eligibility, must be sent a notice that benefits will be reduced or terminated in 10 calendar days. Please see Attachment C for the prototype “Letter of Verification Results and Change in Eligibility.”

SFAs must take the following actions if the household fails to cooperate with verification efforts:

  • SFAs must follow up with families who do not respond to initial verification efforts with at least one attempt in writing (including to a parent or guardian’s email) or by telephone or text message. All attempts must be documented and ensure that LEP households are provided adequate language assistance and understand the need to respond to the verification request.  Additional follow up after this is encouraged but not required.
    • SFAs may contract with a third party to make additional attempts to follow up with non-responders.
  • Prior to actual reduction in benefits or termination of benefits, 10 calendar days advance written notification must be provided to the household.
    • The first day of the 10-calendar day advance notification must be the day the notice is sent to the household.
  • The notice must advise the household of a change in benefits, reason for the change, the right to appeal and that an appeal must be filed within the 10 calendar days advance notice period to ensure continued benefits while awaiting a hearing and decision, how and when the appeal must be filed, and that the household may re-apply for meal benefits.
    • If the household provides information that confirms their eligibility within the 10 calendar days, the family must continue to receive benefits.
    • If there is no response, benefits must be terminated on day 11.
  • Reductions or changes in benefits must be extended to all children in the household who were originally determined to be eligible by information that no longer supports the benefit level.
  • Households that appeal the reduction or termination of benefits within the 10-calendar day notice must continue to receive benefits until the decision of the hearing official is made.  

When Verification is Considered Complete

The following demonstrates how an SFA determines whether or not the household adequately responded and whether follow-up is required.

  • The household submits either adequate written evidence or collateral contact corroboration of income or categorical eligibility:
    • Verification is considered complete for this household;
  • The household submits either adequate written evidence or collateral contact corroboration of income which indicates that the child(ren) should receive either a greater or lesser level of benefits:
    • Verification is considered complete for this household when the notice of adverse action is sent or household is notified that its benefits will be increased or decreased;
  • The household indicates, verbally or in writing, that it no longer wishes to receive free or reduced-price benefits:
    • Verification is considered complete when the notice of adverse action is sent;
  • The application provides case numbers and it is determined that no household member is receiving benefits from an Assistance Program:
    •  Verification is considered complete when the notice of adverse action is sent.
  • The household does not respond or fails to provide adequate documentation after the required follow up or the household refuses to cooperate with verification efforts.
    • Verification is considered complete when the notice of adverse action is sent.

Verification Recordkeeping

The SFA must retain all documents submitted by the household or duplicates of those documents, including all relevant correspondence between the SFA and households. You may document and/or note information directly on the application when contacting families for further information.  A separate sheet of paper can also be attached. If the documents cannot be kept, the verifying official must make a written record of the documents submitted. Copies of all relevant correspondence between the households selected for verification and the school must be maintained with program records for three years plus the current year.

For each application verified, SFAs must maintain records documenting:

  • The source of information used to verify the application
    • Documentation may include a wage stub or documentation from employer or collateral contacts
  • Any changes in eligibility as a result of verification, including:
    • the changes
    • the reason for the changes
    • date the changes were made
    • records of follow-up attempts and results

Program regulations also require SFAs to maintain a description of their verification activities.

This includes:

  • the total number of applications on file as of October 1
  • a summary of the verification efforts, including the selection process
  • the percentage and number of applications that have been verified
  • the SFA must also be able to demonstrate compliance with the confirmation review requirement and provision of a no-cost telephone number for assistance in the verification process

Verification for Cause

The procedures discussed above refer to the required verification process. Applications that are verified “for cause” are in addition to the annually required verification process. SFAs have an obligation to verify all questionable applications (verification “for cause”). SFAs must verify any questionable application including, on a case-by-case basis, verifying any application for cause when the SFA is aware of additional income or persons in the household.

Only after the determination of eligibility has been made can the SFA begin the verification process. Determining officials are strongly encouraged to contact the household during the certification process to clarify any information that is unclear or questionable, before certifying the application and proceeding with verification for cause. Once households have been requested to provide documentation for cause, the SFA must complete the verification process for these households.

It is important to note that the restriction on sample size does not apply to a State’s ability to conduct application verification activities connected to its general oversight responsibilities. For cause may include, but is not limited to, situations where school officials have knowledge of household circumstances that would cause them to verify the information on the application.

SFAs should follow the verification procedures outlined above when verifying an application “for cause”.

If the household fails to submit requested verification information by the date specified by the SFA or submits verification information that does not support the initial determination of eligibility, the household must be sent a notice of adverse action to terminate the free or reduced meal benefits.

The number of applications verified "for cause" and the results of verifying those applications must be reported on the Verification Collection Report (Question VC1). The applications “verified for cause” do not contribute toward your required sample size for the annual verification requirement. Please read the Verification Collection Report Instructions carefully.

Verification for Cause of School District Employees

Verification for cause must not be used to automatically verify the households of all SFA employees whose children are certified for free or reduced-price meals.  However, from among the list of children approved for free or reduced-price meals, an SFA could identify children of SFA employees and use SFA salary information available to them to identify questionable applications and then conduct verifications for cause on those questionable applications.

SFAs can use verification for cause to review approved applications for free or reduced-price meals when known or available information indicates SFA employees may have misrepresented the income on their applications to receive free or reduced-price meals for their children.  USDA recommends that an SFA consult with legal counsel in establishing the parameters of verification for cause for school district employees.

Verification Questions and Answers

What if an application is selected for verification, but the household transfers out of the SFA before the information can be verified?

Verification is considered complete when a household's eligibility for the level of benefits for which it was approved is either confirmed or the household is sent a letter of change in eligibility.  If a household selected for verification transfers out of the SFA before the information can be verified, verification cannot be completed. To meet the minimum verification requirements, a new application must be selected.

How is overtime income counted for the purpose of verification?

The school official should work with the household to determine whether the overtime for the month being verified is representative of overtime received in other months.  If the overtime is a one-time or sporadic source of income, it should not be used in calculating regular income.

Am I verifying eligibility at the time of application or current eligibility?

Verification is intended to establish eligibility for any point in time between the months prior to application and the time the household is required to provide income documentation.  However, if the family income decreases making them eligible for increased benefits, then the school should verify current income.

If a household is paid weekly and submits a pay stub for a week, must I go back and ask for pay stubs for a whole month?

No.  If the weekly pay stub is representative of what the household normally receives each week, one pay stub is sufficient.

Must the SFA select the sample size to verify from each school within the SFA or from the SFA as a whole?

SFAs are required to select and verify a sample of their approved free and reduced-price applications SFA wide. The SFA as a whole must meet the required sample size requirement. This does not mean that each school has to verify the required number of applications.

If my sample size is 4.2 applications, do I verify 4 or 5?

Decimals must always be rounded up to the next whole number.  Therefore, you must verify 5 applications.

Do we have to maintain the actual documentation from verification or just the results of verification?

You are required to maintain a description of your verification efforts including the selection process, the total number of applications on file as of October 1, and the number of applications that were/will be verified by November 15th. For each application verified, the SFA must keep records of the source of information used to verify the application such as wage stubs or names and titles of collateral contacts. In addition, the applications selected must be readily retrievable by school, and the SFA must document correspondence between the selected households and the school.  The verification official must retain the documents, a photocopy, or annotations that indicate which documents were submitted by the household and the date of submission.  You must also keep a record of any change in eligibility as a result of verification procedures, the reason for the change, and the date the change was made. Please also see the “Recordkeeping” section of this manual and the “USDA Eligibility Manual for School Meals” for additional information on record keeping requirements.

When a notice of adverse action has been sent to a household, may I claim reimbursement for that child during the period covered by the notice?

Yes.  The household must be given 10 calendar days advance written notice that a change is being made in the child's eligibility status.  During that time, the child must continue to receive free or reduced-price meal benefits and the SFA may continue to claim reimbursement for free or reduced price meals served to the child during this period.

If an SFA chooses to select more than 3 percent or the minimum number of required households to verify, and some of those households fail to respond, has the SFA completed the verification requirement as long as 3 percent or the minimum number of required households respond?

No. First, the SFA cannot select any more or any less applications than the 3% sample size determined based on the method of verification performed. Second, all households selected for verification must either respond or have benefits terminated after appropriate notification.

If an application contains three sources of income, how many should be verified?

All three sources of income must be verified.  All sources originally noted by the family at the time of application must be verified.

What if the SFA forgets to do verification?

Verification is an annual requirement.  We will contact an SFA that has not submitted the Verification Collection Report (Attachment G) by the required deadline of December 15th each year.  If income verification is not completed, the SFA jeopardizes its State and federal reimbursement for free and reduced meals served after November 15th of that school year.

When should an application be verified "for cause"?

If an SFA is informed, even anonymously, that an applicant may not be eligible, the SFA must follow up on the allegation using the verification process.  The SFA has an obligation to verify all questionable applications (applications that are reported to be fraudulent or suspicious). Verification that is done for cause is in addition to the sample required for either error prone/random/focused sampling.  Verification must take place after the application was approved on the face value of the application.

What information must be submitted online to the Child Nutrition Program office by December 15th?

All information reported on the Verification Collection Report (Attachment G) must be reported on the on-line form on the Child Nutrition Management System (CNMS).  All other verification documentation, along with a copy of the verification worksheet, must be kept on file for three years plus the current year.  SFAs in Provision 2 must retain all verification information from the base year for three years plus the current year after the end of the cycle.

If a foster child is listed on a family’s application as a household member and that household happens to be selected for verification, does the school need anything extra for verification?

It depends on the situation.  If a household is chosen for verification and the foster child included on the application was identified by a State or local foster agency, then no additional verification is needed for the foster child. However, to verify the other children in the household, the family must provide verification documentation to confirm eligibility.

If the foster child is not identified by a State or local foster agency, then documentation verifying the foster child’s status would be required. Additionally, to verify other children in the household, the family must provide verification documentation to confirm eligibility.

What documentation must be provided for a foster child listed on a household application that is selected to be verified?

Documentation from a State or local foster care agency or the court where the foster child received placement is acceptable for verification.  Direct contact from the foster care agency or court (for example, a list of foster children sent to the SFA) is also acceptable documentation for verification.

What should I do if a family was approved for free meals based on a SNAP number but sends in a paystub for verification that makes them ineligible?

The SFA should first conduct direct verification to confirm the family’s eligibility for SNAP. If the SFA cannot verify eligibility through direct verification, they should contact the family to determine if they can document their SNAP eligibility for the month prior to submitting their application.  If they can document their eligibility at that time, the free benefits must continue, and verification is complete. If the required SNAP documentation is not provided, the income stub must be used to determine their eligibility.

What if I receive an application for a child and then receive the child's name on a list from either the Migrant Education Program Coordinator or Homeless Liaison?

The list from the Migrant Education Program Coordinator and Homeless Liaison supersedes the application. The application should be discarded and should not be included in determining the number of applications on file. The child should not be selected for verification.

SFAs Required to Conduct Income Verification

SFAs that are required to conduct income verification will appear on the list below, which also includes an indicator of the allowable sampling methods for each SFA.




SFA LEA Code SFA Name Method(s) of Verification that may be used
500402226478 A H Schreiber Hebrew Acad Of Rocklan Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
142101040000 Akron CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140101060000 Alden CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
020101040000 Alfred-Almond CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
031501187966 All Saints School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140201060000 Amherst CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
130801996542 Anderson Center For Autism Error Prone Method
120102040000 Andes CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
500308990003 Arc Rockland Co Chap Prime Time Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310100149000 Archdiocese Of Ny Error Prone Method
660405030000 Ardsley UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
571901040000 Arkport CSD Error Prone Method
131601060000 Arlington CSD Error Prone Method
670201060000 Attica CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
222201155866 Augustinian Academy-Elementary Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
491302060000 Averill Park CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
240101040000 Avon CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580101030000 Babylon UFSD Error Prone Method
342800226480 Bais Yaakov Academy For Girls Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
141800137227 Baker Hall School Error Prone Method
280210030000 Baldwin UFSD Error Prone Method
420901060000 Baldwinsville CSD Error Prone Method
521301060000 Ballston Spa CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
401301040000 Barker CSD Error Prone Method
580505020000 Bayport-Blue Point UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
130200010000 Beacon City SD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
231301040000 Beaver River CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660102060000 Bedford CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280207020000 Bellmore UFSD Error Prone Method
280253070000 Bellmore-Merrick Central HS District Error Prone Method
061001040000 Bemus Point CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010201040000 Berne-Knox-Westerlo CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
331700207384 Beth Rivkah High School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010306060000 Bethlehem CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280521030000 Bethpage UFSD Error Prone Method
332100229485 Big Apple Institute Inc Error Prone Method
342700228636 Bnos Bais Yaakov Of Far Rockaway Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
342800225513 Bnos Malka Academy Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
630101040000 Bolton CSD Error Prone Method
480601060000 Brewster CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
260101060000 Brighton CSD Error Prone Method
171102040000 Broadalbin-Perth CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580203020000 Brookhaven-Comsewogue UFSD Error Prone Method
490202040000 Brunswick CSD (Brittonkill) Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
520101060000 Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake CSD Error Prone Method
661201060000 Byram Hills CSD Error Prone Method
180701040000 Byron-Bergen CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
240201040000 Caledonia-Mumford CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
430300050000 Canandaigua City SD Error Prone Method
510201060000 Canton CSD Error Prone Method
142601136593 Cardinal O'Hara High School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280411030000 Carle Place UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
480102060000 Carmel CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
222201060000 Carthage CSD Error Prone Method
400800135992 Catholic Academy Of Niagara Falls Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
250201060000 Cazenovia CSD Error Prone Method
010100997850 Center For Disability Services Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580233020000 Center Moriches UFSD Error Prone Method
661004060000 Chappaqua CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
101001040000 Chatham CSD Error Prone Method
060800630025 Chautauqua Opportunities Inc Error Prone Method
090601020000 Chazy UFSD Error Prone Method
030101060000 Chenango Forks CSD Error Prone Method
030701060000 Chenango Valley CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
440201020000 Chester UFSD Error Prone Method
140600890137 Child And Family Services/Conners Error Prone Method
620600997425 Childrens Home Kingston Grove St Aca Error Prone Method
131500890135 Childrens Home Of Poughkeepsie Error Prone Method
660411021005 Children's Village Inc (The) Error Prone Method
251601060000 Chittenango CSD Error Prone Method
140203806578 Christian Central Academy Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261501060000 Churchville-Chili CSD Error Prone Method
140801060000 Clarence CSD Error Prone Method
500101060000 Clarkstown CSD Error Prone Method
060701040000 Clymer CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580402060000 Cold Spring Harbor CSD Error Prone Method
510501040000 Colton-Pierrepont CSD Error Prone Method
580410030000 Commack UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140600851000 Compass House Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
441600229607 Congregation Mesifta Ohr Hatalmud Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580507060000 Connetquot CSD Error Prone Method
471701040000 Cooperstown CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
230201040000 Copenhagen CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
571000808888 Corning Christian Academy Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
440301060000 Cornwall CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310200630021 Covenant House Error Prone Method
190501040000 Coxsackie-Athens CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
333200125708 Cristo Rey Brooklyn High School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660202030000 Croton-Harmon UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580107030000 Deer Park UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
120501040000 Delaware Academy CSD At Delhi Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
400400136417 Desales Catholic Elementary School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
131701999086 Devereux In NY Error Prone Method
660403030000 Dobbs Ferry UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
530101040000 Duanesburg CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140301030000 East Aurora UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
430501040000 East Bloomfield CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
490301060000 East Greenbush CSD Error Prone Method
580301020000 East Hampton UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
260801060000 East Irondequoit CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580503030000 East Islip UFSD Error Prone Method
280203030000 East Meadow UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580234020000 East Moriches UFSD Error Prone Method
580917020000 East Quogue UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
500402060000 East Ramapo CSD (Spring Valley) Error Prone Method
280219030000 East Rockaway UFSD Error Prone Method
280402030000 East Williston UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580912060000 Eastport-South Manor CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
141201060000 Eden CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
470501040000 Edmeston CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
180901040000 Elba CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
040901040000 Ellicottville CSD Error Prone Method
421800997437 Elmcrest Childrens Center Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280216020000 Elmont UFSD Error Prone Method
660409020000 Elmsford UFSD Error Prone Method
580401020000 Elwood UFSD Error Prone Method
420601040000 Fabius-Pompey CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261301060000 Fairport CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
061101040000 Falconer CSD Error Prone Method
280522030000 Farmingdale UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
421001060000 Fayetteville-Manlius CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280222020000 Floral Park-Bellerose UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
442115020000 Florida UFSD Error Prone Method
270601040000 Fonda-Fultonville CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
640502040000 Fort Ann CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280217020000 Franklin Square UFSD Error Prone Method
062201060000 Fredonia CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310200630310 Fresh Air Fund (The) Error Prone Method
060301040000 Frewsburg CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
141604060000 Frontier CSD Error Prone Method
520701040000 Galway CSD Error Prone Method
650902040000 Gananda CSD Error Prone Method
280218030000 Garden City UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261600860826 Genesee Community Cs Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261600861188 Genesee Community Cs-Flour City Error Prone Method
249000000000 Genesee Valley Boces Error Prone Method
240401040000 Geneseo CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
100902040000 Germantown CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310200630289 Good Shepherd Services Error Prone Method
440601040000 Goshen CSD Error Prone Method
141501060000 Grand Island CSD Error Prone Method
280407030000 Great Neck UFSD Error Prone Method
260501808815 Greece Christian School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
320800716855 Greek American Inst Of NY Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
480601996550 Green Chimneys School-Little Folks Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010100860907 Green Tech High Charter School Error Prone Method
190701040000 Greenville CSD Error Prone Method
640801040000 Greenwich CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
442111020000 Greenwood Lake UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010802060000 Guilderland CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
480401040000 Haldane CSD Error Prone Method
580405060000 Half Hollow Hills CSD Error Prone Method
141601060000 Hamburg CSD Error Prone Method
250701040000 Hamilton CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310400860812 Harbor Sci & Arts Charter School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580406060000 Harborfields CSD Error Prone Method
660501060000 Harrison CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
230301040000 Harrisville CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580506030000 Hauppauge UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
332000227132 Hebrew Academy For Spec Chldrn Error Prone Method
591401226474 Hebrew Day School Of Sullivan & Ulst Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660203060000 Hendrick Hudson CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280409030000 Herricks UFSD Error Prone Method
280214030000 Hewlett-Woodmere UFSD Error Prone Method
620803040000 Highland CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
440901040000 Highland Falls CSD Error Prone Method
260101226476 Hillel Community Day School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261600997698 Hillside Childrens Center School Error Prone Method
261101060000 Hilton CSD Error Prone Method
141701040000 Holland CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
412201060000 Holland Patent CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
081200185526 Holy Family School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
110701060000 Homer CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
431401040000 Honeoye CSD Error Prone Method
260901060000 Honeoye Falls-Lima CSD Error Prone Method
491401040000 Hoosic Valley CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
490501060000 Hoosick Falls CSD Error Prone Method
070901060000 Horseheads CSD Error Prone Method
130801100002 Hudson River Housing Inc Error Prone Method
580403030000 Huntington UFSD Error Prone Method
220301060000 Indian River CSD Error Prone Method
141301060000 Iroquois CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660402020000 Irvington UFSD Error Prone Method
280231020000 Island Park UFSD Error Prone Method
280226030000 Island Trees UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580502020000 Islip UFSD Error Prone Method
610600010000 Ithaca City SD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
662101997144 Ives School Error Prone Method
420411060000 Jamesville-Dewitt CSD Error Prone Method
280515030000 Jericho UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310200630024 Jewish Child Care Assoc Of NY Error Prone Method
662300990001 Julia Dyckman Andrus Memorial Inc Error Prone Method
660101030000 Katonah-Lewisboro UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
150601040000 Keene CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
450607040000 Kendall CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
101401040000 Kinderhook CSD Error Prone Method
580805060000 Kings Park CSD Error Prone Method
010100115705 La Salle School Error Prone Method
630701040000 Lake George CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
151102040000 Lake Placid CSD Error Prone Method
200601040000 Lake Pleasant CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
662401060000 Lakeland CSD Error Prone Method
141901060000 Lancaster CSD Error Prone Method
610801040000 Lansing CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
181001060000 Le Roy CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
670401040000 Letchworth CSD Error Prone Method
280205030000 Levittown UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
400301060000 Lewiston-Porter CSD Error Prone Method
580104030000 Lindenhurst UFSD Error Prone Method
511602040000 Lisbon CSD Error Prone Method
580603021005 Little Flower Children's Services Error Prone Method
240801060000 Livonia CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280503060000 Locust Valley CSD Error Prone Method
280300010000 Long Beach City SD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280407229720 Long Island Hebrew Academy Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
230901040000 Lowville Academy & CSD Error Prone Method
280220030000 Lynbrook UFSD Error Prone Method
511901040000 Madrid-Waddington CSD Error Prone Method
332100226924 Magen David Yesh-Isaac Shlm E Error Prone Method
480101060000 Mahopac CSD Error Prone Method
031101060000 Maine-Endwell CSD Error Prone Method
280212030000 Malverne UFSD Error Prone Method
660701030000 Mamaroneck UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280406030000 Manhasset UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
421101060000 Marcellus CSD Error Prone Method
650701040000 Marion CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
621001060000 Marlboro CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280523030000 Massapequa UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
581012020000 Mattituck-Cutchogue UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
332100225701 Mazel Day School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010615020000 Menands UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280502891000 MercyFirst Error Prone Method
332100206993 Mesivta Yeshiva Rabbi Chaim Berlin Error Prone Method
132201040000 Millbrook CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580208020000 Miller Place UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280410030000 Mineola UFSD Error Prone Method
441101040000 Minisink Valley CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
269100000000 Monroe 1 Boces Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
441201060000 Monroe-Woodbury CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
151102999844 Mountain Lake Childrens Residence Error Prone Method
660801060000 Mt Pleasant CSD Error Prone Method
580207020000 Mt Sinai UFSD Error Prone Method
500108030000 Nanuet UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280401951000 Nassau Co Juvenile Detention Center Error Prone Method
310600861015 Neighborhood Cs Of Harlem Error Prone Method
280405020000 New Hyde Park-Garden City Park UFSD Error Prone Method
621101060000 New Paltz CSD Error Prone Method
180300877197 New York State School For The Blind Error Prone Method
411800877482 New York State School For The Deaf Error Prone Method
151001040000 Newcomb CSD Error Prone Method
400701060000 Niagara-Wheatfield CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
530301060000 Niskayuna CSD Error Prone Method
580103030000 North Babylon UFSD Error Prone Method
280204020000 North Bellmore UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
142201040000 North Collins CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010623060000 North Colonie CSD Error Prone Method
280229020000 North Merrick UFSD Error Prone Method
661301040000 North Salem CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280501060000 North Shore CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
420303060000 North Syracuse CSD Error Prone Method
530600998000 Northeast Parent & Child Society Error Prone Method
580404030000 Northport-East Northport UFSD Error Prone Method
412300185517 Notre Dame Elementary School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
180300137112 Notre Dame High School Error Prone Method
500304030000 Nyack UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
310200890011 Nyc Admin-Children'S Services Error Prone Method
181101040000 Oakfield-Alabama CSD Error Prone Method
280211030000 Oceanside UFSD Error Prone Method
419000000000 Oneida-Herkimer-Madison Boces Error Prone Method
142301060000 Orchard Park CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
461300011001 Oswego County Opportunities Inc-Saf Error Prone Method
342400640003 Outreach Development Corp Error Prone Method
280506060000 Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD Error Prone Method
650901060000 Palmyra-Macedon CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
061601040000 Panama CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010100996557 Parsons Child And Family Center Error Prone Method
580224030000 Patchogue-Medford UFSD Error Prone Method
181201040000 Pavilion CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
131201040000 Pawling CSD Error Prone Method
500308030000 Pearl River UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
661601030000 Pelham UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
181302040000 Pembroke CSD Error Prone Method
261201060000 Penfield CSD Error Prone Method
440401060000 Pine Bush CSD Error Prone Method
131301040000 Pine Plains CSD Error Prone Method
280518030000 Plainedge UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280504060000 Plainview-Old Bethpage CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660809030000 Pleasantville UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660802040000 Pocantico Hills CSD Error Prone Method
580206020000 Port Jefferson UFSD Error Prone Method
280404030000 Port Washington UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
042901040000 Portville CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
512902060000 Potsdam CSD Error Prone Method
641401040000 Putnam CSD Error Prone Method
480503040000 Putnam Valley CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
142801137104 Queen Of Heaven School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
630902030000 Queensbury UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
043001040000 Randolph CSD Error Prone Method
010402060000 Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
131701060000 Red Hook CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580901020000 Remsenburg-Speonk UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
491200010000 Rensselaer City SD Error Prone Method
310100890210 Restart/Odyssey I Error Prone Method
131801040000 Rhinebeck CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
342900860974 Riverton Street Charter School Error Prone Method
261600997046 Rochester School For The Deaf Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280221030000 Rockville Centre UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580209020000 Rocky Point UFSD Error Prone Method
620901060000 Rondout Valley CSD Error Prone Method
280403030000 Roslyn UFSD Error Prone Method
530515060000 Rotterdam-Mohonasen CSD Error Prone Method
401201060000 Royalton-Hartland CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261701060000 Rush-Henrietta CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
661901030000 Rye Neck UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580205060000 Sachem CSD Error Prone Method
221001040000 Sackets Harbor CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580305020000 Sag Harbor UFSD Error Prone Method
421800630012 Salvation Army (The) Error Prone Method
091402060000 Saranac CSD Error Prone Method
161401060000 Saranac Lake CSD Error Prone Method
521800010000 Saratoga Springs City SD Error Prone Method
621601060000 Saugerties CSD Error Prone Method
580504030000 Sayville UFSD Error Prone Method
530501060000 Schalmont CSD Error Prone Method
491501040000 Schodack CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
521701040000 Schuylerville CSD Error Prone Method
280501890176 Sco Family Of Services Error Prone Method
530202060000 Scotia-Glenville CSD Error Prone Method
280206030000 Seaford UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
030200185471 Seton Catholic Central Jr/Sr High Error Prone Method
091101159175 Seton Catholic School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280252070000 Sewanhaka Central HS District Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580701020000 Shelter Island UFSD Error Prone Method
310200890009 Sheltering Arms Children Family Serv Error Prone Method
520302060000 Shenendehowa CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
412000050000 Sherrill City SD Error Prone Method
421601060000 Skaneateles CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580801060000 Smithtown CSD Error Prone Method
662101060000 Somers CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010601060000 South Colonie CSD Error Prone Method
521401040000 South Glens Falls CSD Error Prone Method
220101040000 South Jefferson CSD Error Prone Method
121702040000 South Kortright CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
500301060000 South Orangetown CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
581005020000 Southold UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
060201060000 Southwestern CSD At Jamestown Error Prone Method
131602020000 Spackenkill UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261001060000 Spencerport CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
471101997806 Springbrook New York, Inc Error Prone Method
141101060000 Springville-Griffith Inst CSD Error Prone Method
142601136293 St Amelia School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
010100115658 St Anne Institute Error Prone Method
010100997791 St Catherine'S Center For Children Error Prone Method
141604136402 St Francis High School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140203136273 St Gregory The Great School Error Prone Method
400701325766 St John Lutheran School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
142601136418 St John The Baptist School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
140101136379 St John The Baptist School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
342700890003 St Johns Residence School Boys Error Prone Method
140600136376 St Mark School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
141901136283 St Mary'S Elementary School Error Prone Method
401001060000 Starpoint CSD Error Prone Method
400301136253 Stella Niagara Educ Park Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
522001040000 Stillwater CSD Error Prone Method
500401060000 Suffern CSD Error Prone Method
591502040000 Sullivan West CSD Error Prone Method
500304998107 Summit School Error Prone Method
280502060000 Syosset CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
342700228893 Talmud Torah Siach Yitzchok Error Prone Method
220701040000 Thousand Islands CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580201060000 Three Village CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280300206622 Torah High School Long Beach Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
332200226937 Torah Vodaath High School Error Prone Method
211901020000 Town Of Webb UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
512001155896 Trinity Catholic School Error Prone Method
611001040000 Trumansburg CSD Error Prone Method
660302030000 Tuckahoe UFSD Error Prone Method
421902040000 Tully CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
441903020000 Tuxedo UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
660401030000 Ufsd-Tarrytowns Error Prone Method
660805030000 Valhalla UFSD Error Prone Method
441301060000 Valley CSD (Montgomery) Error Prone Method
280224020000 Valley Stream 24 UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280251070000 Valley Stream Central HS District Error Prone Method
490804998235 Vanderheyden Hall Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
031601060000 Vestal CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
431701060000 Victor CSD Error Prone Method
260501996191 Villa Of Hope Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
353100880287 Vol Of Amer - Greater Ny Inc Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
011003060000 Voorheesville CSD Error Prone Method
621801060000 Wallkill CSD Error Prone Method
280223030000 Wantagh UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
132101060000 Wappingers CSD Error Prone Method
442101060000 Warwick Valley CSD Error Prone Method
440102060000 Washingtonville CSD Error Prone Method
650801060000 Wayne CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
261901060000 Webster CSD Error Prone Method
050301040000 Weedsport CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
200901040000 Wells CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580102030000 West Babylon UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
420101060000 West Genesee CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
280227030000 West Hempstead UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
260803060000 West Irondequoit CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580509030000 West Islip UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
440901996121 West Point Middle School Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
142801060000 West Seneca CSD Error Prone Method
589300000000 Western Suffolk Boces Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
580902020000 Westhampton Beach UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
420701060000 Westhill CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
170301020000 Wheelerville UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
412902060000 Whitesboro CSD Error Prone Method
140203060000 Williamsville CSD Error Prone Method
401501060000 Wilson CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
191401040000 Windham-Ashland-Jewett CSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
610327021005 Wm George Agency For Child Ser Error Prone Method
490804020000 Wynantskill UFSD Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
332000226948 Yeshiva Chsan Sofer Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
500402229549 Yeshiva Gedolah Of South Monsey Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
500402226477 Yeshiva Of Spring Valley Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
342800227222 Yeshiva Tifereth Moshe Error Prone Method or Alternate Sampling Method (Random or Focused)
662402060000 Yorktown CSD Error Prone Method
660900891031 Youth Shelter Program Of Westchester Error Prone Method